The full research path, start to finish.

Fixed example data. Real decision surfaces — backtest evidence, comparison selection, and forward paper tracking in one pass.

research / spy / connors-rsi / 10bps-round-trip / spy-benchmark example session
01

Backtest

Cost-aware result with out-of-sample validation and benchmark-relative context. Caveats are part of the output, not a footnote.

Sharpe 1.28 after costs
OOS Sharpe 0.82 holdout
Max DD −12.4% stress point
Active return +4.2% vs benchmark
Win rate 58% in-sample
Result is credible. Do not promote yet — put it through comparison first. Next: compare
02

Comparison

All candidates evaluated on the same ticker, window, costs, benchmark, and validation lens. Selection cannot be driven by one flattering chart.

Candidate Validation Sharpe Active return Decision
Connors RSI Credible 1.28 +3.6% Promote to paper
MACD Mixed 0.61 +0.7% Keep as reference
TSMOM Fragile −0.14 −1.2% Reject for now
Connors RSI is the only candidate to survive comparison. Promoted to paper
03

Paper tracking

Live days 104 since promotion
Forward return +5.8% live
Worst DD −3.1% forward
Status Monitor no action
Proof

Open the real artifacts.

The demo is compressed. These public surfaces show the full research depth Alphrex exposes when a result is shared.

SPY RSI(3) Pullback

Backtest report · Friction-aware mean reversion still clears holdout and benchmark-relative checks.

QQQ Trend Filter Review

Compare review · Donchian survives after MACD and TSMOM are forced through the same benchmark-aware window.

Balanced Tactical Portfolio

Portfolio review · Forward sleeve mix judged against a factor-matched 60/40 reference with concentration and alert context intact.

Next

Run the same path on your own idea.

Create a free workspace, pick a strategy, and use the first result as a decision surface — not a claim.